Of course not!  

Today, let's not talk about technical work, let's just talk about this issue. Recently, there have been many people discussing this topic online. In fact, since floating into China, this topic has been around for a long time and has become commonplace.  

Some humans have a habit of thinking that things they cannot understand are wrong. This is actually a self-protection mechanism, because they don't want to feel embarrassed in front of others because of their lack of understanding of something, so they directly deny it and use contemptuous rhetoric, just to quickly skip the topic. 

I know someone who never believes in things outside of their own cognition and firmly denies that their inference results are different from theirs. I think this is a manifestation of ignorance, narrow mindedness, and arrogance, with limited thinking, looking at problems from a single perspective, and not being able to think, in other words, low intelligence.  

For example, when traditional Chinese medicine was first introduced to foreign countries, foreigners did not believe that they could tell the condition by simply touching a pulse with their hands? How many needles can be inserted into a person's body to cure the disease? Even some people have used modern anatomy to prove that there are no so-called meridians in the human body.

Similarly, in the field of energetics abroad, how many people believe in the seven major chakras of the human body in ancient India? But can you say that they are really all pseudoscience? Is it really non-existent? Something that cannot be proven is like, even if you dissect the human body and cannot find the meridians, you still cannot prove that the system of traditional Chinese medicine is wrong. 

After talking so much nonsense, I just want to make it clear that the same principle applies to floating cabins. You can choose not to understand, not to understand, not to understand, or even not interested, without having to engage with it. However, you cannot directly deny that it is pseudoscience.

In terms of technology, it is based on the underlying technical logic of restricted environmental stimulation therapy and natural frequency technology, equipped with ultrasound cell massage technology, vital sign monitoring technology, and multi frequency brainwave interference technology .....

Okay, are you trying to say again that these are all pseudoscience and can't be trusted? What kind of nonsense, I don't understand, fake! All of them are fake! 

In terms of history, it originated in the United States in 1954, initially used to address post-war trauma syndrome in veterans, and first entered China in 1994, introduced by Professor Hu from Peking University for research on sleep. Then it transitioned from scientific research to the military, and then from the military to civilian use, officially starting to spread among the civilian population in 2015.

If we have to talk about pseudoscience, it's not impossible. For example, if someone with malicious intentions exaggerates that floating can treat cancer, it will definitely give them a big catch; If someone tells you what kind of divine water floating liquid is, or what ancient ocean water it is, then give them a straight blow. 

Um That's all for today! As for whether floating is an intelligence tax or not, you should have the answer in your own mind. No matter what others say, they can't shake your thoughts, so let's not say anything.